|
Apparently sometime in 2017, a strata committee requested the preparation of report on our building's compliance with current (2016) Building Code of Australia (BCA). It seems that an initial report was issued in January 2018, and another version submitted in April 2019. The reason for requesting the report was not revealed and it is unusual to request such a report without an order from relevant authorities such as a Development Control Order (DCO). The SC is unaware of any such order for our building.
Both versions of the report make it clear that all parties are to recognise that there will always be deficiencies in existing buildings when comparing them to buildings built to current building codes. During the period of preparation of the report, there were a number of changes to regulations including definitions for performance solutions and fire safety experts. There is an emerging profession of high priced fire safety engineers that promote consultancy services to help existing buildings to meet current standards for fire safety. The SC has met with such a professional to glean performance solution information related to our boundary with 46 Victoria Parade. A performance solution is viable without any structural changes, but documentation and complying development requirements would be disproportionately expensive. The report does have a list of recommendations to be completed over a three year period including:
Since the report, the regulations have continued to evolve with some which seem favourable for existing buildings such as fire hydrant concessions for existing buildings. Many of the recommendations would be intrusive to various areas of the building and it would be prudent to coordinate any building aesthetic improvements with fire safety recommendations. For this reason, the SC has postponed consideration of internal building improvements until discussions on this matter with the OC. The SC has been preparing a Fire Audit Considerations document to help sift through the extensive and convoluted jargon in the report. The intent is to simplify highlighted topics into Strata member friendly language that can be used to inform a master plan with a 10 year capital works plan and aesthetic vision. The SC wishes to assess the views of all OC members on a path forward for our response to the report. There are various options for the path forward such as:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
42VP BlogThis blog recorded the activities by the SP34151 Strata Committee during the period February 2020 to 4 May 2021. |